Speaking as a Wells reader
for the last three years I've worked HEAVILY on the works of H. G. Wells. While I can lay claim to no authority, I've got two lengthy essays up for publication on his St. Simonian socialist beliefs and his demarcation of Distopia. I remember my original ecstacy at the proposed project from your teaser. As I said then, the premise you're bringing to the small, small screen is a rather intrinisic once since you won't be able to accomodate the sociological message of the piece. Contrawise- if you're looking for modernity- you'll lose a major portion of the original novels-
Wells was in his words, "a psuedo-scientific interloper" (Things to Come in preface) who looked to explain the social ills of mankind through futurity and technoloy. The Time Machine, for example, would be something worthwhile to look at considering Wells helped to manage the score and songs for the musical. his use of rhetoric was incredibly indepth and focused towards his audience. Again drawing allusions to "The Time Machine" the time Traveller in actuality makes three theories on the world in decline he finds in the year 802,701 A.D.- but he begins his journey through a jest about socialism. "I realized that there were no small houses to be seen. Apparently the single house...had vanished. Here and there among the greenery were palace-like buildings, but the house and the cottage...had disappeared. 'Communism,' I said to myself" (Time Machine, 45). Likewise, Wells used "War of the Worlds" to dictate what he felt would be unltra-modern contrivances for war...ending simply by the aliens' inability to cope with the common cold. WotW reasoned the intervention of flight and atomic power- two factors which would undoubtly (in Wells's mind) elevate War to an anonymous figure behind a control panel pushing a button rather than the millions previously needed in foot wars. He predicted the use of atomic weapons as early as 1901 and flight by 1896. this is why I'm sure you'll be amused to know his gravestone epitaph reads, "goddamnit, I told you all so."
Et Al, I feel that this piece bears MORE MERIT than Spielberg o Tom Cruise could ever hope to capture in this latest film adaption. In the long run, like the expected "Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy," movie, I seriously doubt the integrity of the piece. As to the idiot Andy K who last reviewed this movie- american viewers are incredibly stupid as to the literacy of the piece. This is why shitty movies (like I, Robot, Battlefield Earth, and Starshit Troopers) who rip off great science fiction manage to do well at the box office, people don't know any better. They do not nor can they ever comprehend the misjustice "poetic license" by a self righteous bastard can inflict on a piece of literature.
Sci-fi in itself is a difficult genre to enact. Interpretation always leaves a lot to be desired when it comes to using special effects rather than trusting in good writing. I have the highest expectations for this movie when it arrives. As someone who's dedicated his life to studying H. G. Wells and his contemporaries, I eagerly anticipate this to be a film worth reckoning.